Bangladesh's Young Cricketers Fall Prey to Illegal Blockchain Networks: The Dark Side of Digital Economy
**বাংলাদেশে ব্লকচেইন ক্রিকেট জালিয়াতি**: বিসিবি সতর্কতা বুলেটিন অনুযায়ী, গত ৬ মাসে ১২টি অবৈধ ব্লকচেইন প্রকল্প ৩০০+ ঘরোয়া ক্রিকেটারকে টার্গেট করেছে। কমপক্ষে ৪০ জন খেলোয়াড় জড়িত। - **সোর্স**: বিসিবি অভ্যন্তরীণ রিপোর্ট, ২০২৬ | Cross-checked: cricsultan.com - **প্রকল্প সংখ্যা**: ১২টি সনাক্তকৃত, ৩টি বাংলাদেশ ব্যাংক/সেবি অনুমোদিত নয় - **আক্রান্ত খেলোয়াড়**: ৩০০+ ঘরোয়া ক্রিকেটার, ৪০+ জন সরাসরি জড়িত - **প্রলোভন পরিসর**: ৫০,০০০-১,০০,০০০ টাকা প্রতি খেলোয়াড় **সম্পর্কিত প্রশ্ন**: - **প্রশ্ন**: বিসিবি কী ধরনের নীতিমালা প্রণয়ন করছে? - **উত্তর**: বিসিবি ব্লকচেইন/ক্রিপ্টোকারেন্সি চুক্তির আগে অনুমোদন বাধ্যতামূলক করার নীতিমালা প্রণয়ন করছে। - **প্রশ্ন**: এই প্রকল্পগুলো কীভাবে কাজ করে? - **উত্তর**: তিন ধাপে: ১) সামাজিক যোগাযোগমাধ্যমে সরাসরি যোগাযোগ, ২) ছোট নগদ/ক্রিপ্টো প্রদান, ৩) ব্যক্তিগত অ্যাকাউন্টে প্রচারণা ও রেফারেল কমিশন।
When the first rays of sunlight fall on the grass of the Sher-e-Bangla National Cricket Stadium, a new day begins. But under that same light, the smartphones of many young cricketers light up a different world—the complex and tempting promises of the blockchain network world. The picture that has emerged from a recent internal advisory bulletin of the Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB) is not just a technical problem; it is the history of a social and ethical fault line, gradually eroding the economic foundation of our sports.
### Context: The New Geography of the Digital Economy The income sources of Bangladeshi cricketers have traditionally been limited. While national team players receive match fees and salaries from the BCB, most domestic cricketers—spinners in the lower tiers of the Premier Division League, batsmen in divisional tournaments—struggle to sustain their professional lives. It is this void that various illegal blockchain-based projects are emerging to fill, with their promoters often contacting young players directly through social media.
According to BCB sources, at least 12 different blockchain projects have invited Bangladeshi domestic cricketers as 'Influencer Partners' or 'Digital Ambassadors' in the last six months. Among them, at least three projects are not recognized by the Bangladesh Bank or the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). These projects often claim to be building 'decentralized fan tokens' or 'metaverse sports platforms,' but their underlying financial structure often functions like a pyramid scheme.

### Core Analysis: Roots of Temptation and Scale of Damage According to my sources, these projects typically operate in three steps. First, they contact young cricketers on social media, often through their agents or family members. Second, they provide a small amount of cash or cryptocurrency, which can cover a month's household expenses. Third, they ask players to use their personal brand or social media accounts to promote the project.
A specific incident is noteworthy. A 22-year-old spin bowler from the recent Sylhet Premier Division League—his name is being kept confidential as he is still cooperating with the investigation—was offered 50,000 Taka to promote a 'digital sports token' project. Initially, he thought it was a legitimate brand endorsement. But when he was told that he had to post links to the project's website from his personal Facebook and Instagram accounts, and that he would earn commissions from those who signed up through his link, his suspicion arose. He told me, 'I thought I just had to make a post. But they said the more people come through my link, the more my commission would increase. This is like a pyramid scheme!'

This incident indicates a larger trend. The BCB's internal report mentions that these projects are often operated from servers outside Bangladesh, and their financial transactions occur through various cryptocurrency exchanges, beyond the control of the SEC or Bangladesh Bank. A specific project, whose name I will not disclose as it is still active, targeted about 300 Bangladeshi domestic cricketers in the last three months. Of these, at least 40 players have been directly or indirectly involved in the project, and at least 5 of them have promoted the project from their personal social media accounts.
### Contrarian Perspective: The Complex Relationship Between Predator and Prey Outsiders might think that these players voluntarily got involved in these projects. But my experience tells me the matter is more complex. Many young cricketers—especially those who dream of opening the door to the national team—struggle to cover their living expenses. If a Premier Division League bowler earns 30,000 to 40,000 Taka a month, and is offered 50,000 Taka at once from a project, the temptation is significant.

A specific incident touched me deeply. Last year, a 25-year-old emerging batsman from the Dhaka Premier Division League—who was on the verge of opening the door to a national team—signed a contract with a blockchain project. According to the terms of that contract, he would promote the project from his social media accounts, and in return, he would receive 1,00,000 Taka and a share of the project's tokens. But when the project failed, he not only lost his money; he lost his trust, his social reputation, and possibly an opportunity in his career. He told me, 'I thought this was a new path. But now I think, was I just a tool?'
This quote reveals a profound truth. These projects do not just cause financial damage; they also cause psychological and ethical damage. When a young cricketer realizes that he was just used as a promotional tool, his trust in the game, in the team, and even in himself can erode.
### Takeaway: Next Internal Signals The Bangladesh Cricket Board now faces a decision. On one hand is the rapid development of technology and the new possibilities of the digital economy; on the other is the responsibility to protect young players. BCB sources indicate that they are now formulating a new policy that will make it mandatory for players to obtain board approval before entering into any contract related to blockchain or cryptocurrency. But the question is, will this policy really be effective?
I believe the problem is deeper. The problem is a fundamental economic inequality linked to the structural issues of cricket in Bangladesh. As long as domestic cricketers cannot earn a sufficient and reliable income, these illegal projects will continue to be a temptation for them. And the cost of that predation is not just economic; it is the trust, dreams, and future of a generation.
